Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Indicators on bail granted to pregnant woman in 302 case laws You Should Know
Blog Article
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution might be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears in addition to a new system is put in its place.
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of latest opinions The cases listed below have experienced opinions filed for them within the last 14 days. The following information is accessible for Each individual case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, such as signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. They also stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, These are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Whilst there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent during the home state, relevant case law from another state may be deemed through the court.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
We've been an independent branch of government constitutionally entrusted with the fair and just resolution of disputes in order to preserve the rule of law and to protect the rights and liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and laws on the United States and this State.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, it is also a properly-established proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives with the police would be to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, ensure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender along with the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other Courts, However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, within our view, section twenty on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does here provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Criminal cases While in the common law tradition, courts decide the regulation applicable to your case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil law systems, common law systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their very own previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions steady with the previous decisions of higher courts.